I believe in one God (and it doesn’t make my toes curl to continue with, “the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth . . . “). I am happily married to the guy I started dating when I was 18. When it comes to church attendance, though . . . let’s just say that while I have a home church and it is a beloved and important part of my life, I am open to seeing other people.
Confession: religiously speaking, I am a woman of two loves. I love UU in its promise and power, and despite its flaws and its failings. I could use those same words to explain how I feel about Christianity. And specifically, increasingly, what I mean when I say “Christianity” is the church of my childhood–the love and liturgy that is the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.
I don’t get to my old ELCA church very often–a couple of times a year since following, astonished, my husband’s very enthusiastic footsteps to the door of Unitarian Universalism when we were first married. But when I do, what I find in the service is challenge, uplift, joy and peace. These are the same qualities that I encounter in great UU worship, of which my current church is often a shining example–but I sometimes find them more poignantly in the ELCA.
And, especially now, as I spend time in discernment with a call to ministry that already makes no sense (ministry? seriously? what!?), I wonder what that means.
One possibility is simply that I need more depth in my UU theology to find the weight and meaning–the spiritual gravitas–that Christianity comes by easily. A faith steeped in magic and blood and anchored by doctrine–all overlaid on other, much older religions, with their own spirit and sacrifices–comes with an intensity that makes UU as it’s currently practiced feel like a blank slate in comparison . . . or a wading pool.
Don’t misunderstand; I believe that there is incredible depth possible in UU. For me, this is true for at least two reasons–first because, while I am not a Humanist as the word is used in UU circles, humanism as a lens on the world offers a view of almost limitless possibility for what we might achieve together. Second, and in my life more importantly, it’s true because as I engage with my deepest spiritual practices, and UU encourages me to do this as nothing ever has, I am touching the Infinite. And here, of course, the limits aren’t the edges of depth, but of my ability to experience it.
So, great. But the reality is, much of the time this depth remains in UU as a latent possibility I acknowledge rather than my actual ongoing experience. I am discovering, on the other hand, that I can walk into my local ELCA church, join the service alongside strangers, and connect with great depth almost instantly. This, I think, is why I miss the traditional liturgy so acutely. It seems like an odd thing to be more attached to ritual recitation than to a particular answer on the question of the virgin birth, but there you have it–for me, one of these things is merely about, but the other involves connecting with.
When I refer to myself as a UU Christian, there are questions that pop up pretty reliably. Laypeople are inclined to ask, “So why are you here?,” or some variant thereof, and later, “why can’t you just say you’re UU?” People who’ve gone to seminary, on the other hand, say something different: “What does that mean to you?” I have tended to bristle at the first set of questions, and the underlying demands “Explain yourself” and “accept the UU melting pot,”–as though in maintaining an identifiable Christian identity I have rejected UU in some way, or refused to truly enter into community.
I have tended to ignore the more nuanced second question for a different reason entirely–because it’s hard. Here, too, I perceive a challenge of sorts . . . not an identify-defending, fear-driven challenge, but perhaps a sense of superiority: “You almost certainly don’t mean ___, so why does this label have meaning for you?” That’s annoying, and even a bit scary–what happens if I do mean precisely the thing you think I ought not to?–but that’s not the real reason I avoid answering. I don’t answer because I don’t know.
Here’s what I do know: Last week I went to Ash Wednesday service at Trinity. I arrived late, shared a program and a hymnal with a stranger, and spoke to no one aside from a word of thanks to that stranger and to share the peace. I did, however, talk to God. Prayer is a big part of my spiritual practices–I talk to God every day. Help Thanks Wow, as Anne Lamott puts it . . . I’m all over it. There is something different, however, in talking to God in unison.
I was sad, and scared, and hurting . . . and the Kyrie was as balm to my soul. Spending every Sunday–and joyfully; I do love my church–in a place where our two liturgical seasons seem to be PEACE! and CELEBRATE!, I needed the deep purple and bare branches of the Lenten altar. I needed to stand in the company of others and acknowledge that I have struggled and failed, and that I will again. I needed to bow my head in prayer with words for that struggle, and for the struggles of others, and for what we do in and to the world. I needed to break bread and share wine, to remember the Beloved Community that Jesus created, that I might do better in building and honoring that community that has been commended to me. In short, I needed to be reminded of that which is bigger than myself, and I needed to do it with and alongside others.
My God. I miss this.
And yet I have to credit UU here–in seven years I’ve never officially participated on a worship team (aside from a frenetic and scary exercise at Leadership School). Yet somehow, ritual in worship, and to some degree, worship itself, has been deconstructed, reinterpreted, made visible, and maybe even made whole, such that I connect with what we’re doing with the Kyrie in a new way. My changed perspective is simultaneously less threatening (I never did feel threatened by my faith in any conscious way, but high church ritual is intimidating, and how often does it think to explain itself?) and more meaningful.
This deeper connection with worship is a tangible UU gift to my Christian self, and for it I am grateful. And in this perhaps UU and protestant Christianity are the two wings of the bird of my living faith. Maybe that oft-uttered phrase “too Christian to be UU, and too UU to be Christian” is in fact true . . . and even so, perhaps it doesn’t matter at all because it misses the point. The challenge isn’t to pick one or be one or explain one to the other, but to access both, and everything else that is in me, in the service of God.
I will tell you something, though. I’ve never been one for Christian accoutrements, cross jewelry included (as an evangelical pastor once asked us at vacation bible school, “Would you wear a gas chamber around your neck? How about an electric chair?”) So it’s odd that I happen to have this, and it’s not something I notice very often . . . but hanging at a corner of my jewelry case is a tiny silver cross. It sparkles more than an object of torture ought to. If it weren’t so small, it would be wholly indecent. And it’s been catching my eye lately.
It feels like an invitation.
And so, to you pastors and ministers and seminarians of the world . . . you people inclined to ask What It Means to You to Be Christian . . . I don’t know. But I’ll tell you this: it means something. And I don’t want to ask permission or beg forgiveness or even answer you, necessarily . . . it’s between me and God. But I hope there’s space in your big, rational world for a tiny sparkling cross . . . and for the vastness and weight of what comes with it.
I think it may turn out that there is no room for my heart without it.